10 — Wiki · Article 04
Adopting this catalog
A reference catalog is a starting point. Prune it to what you will own, rename what your organization calls differently, give every capability an owner, and test it against your value streams.
Start from it, do not adopt it whole
No reference model fits one organization as published. Expect to rename, merge or split a fair share of capabilities, and to drop the ones you will never own or fund. A smaller map that people use beats a complete one that nobody reads.
- Pick the cross-industry domains you need, then add your industry block.
- Read the in scope and out of scope lines before renaming: they say what each capability means here.
- Keep the catalog id beside your own name, so you can take later releases without losing your edits.
Owners and experts
Two roles keep a capability model useful. A business owner is accountable for the capability's performance and for what its name and description mean. An architect acts as the model's caretaker for that capability, keeping it consistent with the rest of the map and linked to applications, data and value streams. Different methods put the emphasis on one or the other; in practice you need both.
Test it against your value streams
Walk each of your value streams stage by stage and check every stage is served by a capability you kept. A capability no stream needs may not be worth keeping; a stage with no capability is a gap in the map.
Getting it into your tools
Further reading
- List of common business capabilitiesCapstera
Why a generic list is a checklist, business ownership of definitions, and testing against value streams.
- Identifying capability experts and anchoring the business capability modelArdoq help center
Architects as capability experts, starting from a reference model and iterating.
Written in our own words; the sources are linked, not copied. Product names are used only to cite them.